|
|
Acupuncture for asthma
Breathing freely again Acupuncture is often used to help asthma, which seems to be an increasingly common problem for many people. It comes in many different forms - some people find they are mostly struggling to breathe out, others more to breathe in. Some people are worse in damp environments, others in the city. For some it's seasonal, for others it's year-round. For some it's part of an allergic response, to pollen, pets, or other allergens, and for others it's related to phlegm in the lungs.
Acupuncture for asthma does not use a 'one size fits all' approach. The diagnostic process looks at you as an individual, and examines your asthma within the wider context of your health. Your asthma may be diagnosed as one of many different types, and treated accordingly, for example to support the lungs, strengthen your underlying constitution, reduce phlegm or reduce oversensitivity to allergens, as needed in your individual case.
Contact Jessica
Other conditions Acupuncture can help with a wide range of health problems, click below to find out more:
Detailed references (1) http://www.acupuncture-schools.us/national-institute-health-nih-acupuncture.cfm, referring to World Health Organisation (2002). Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trial, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?sesslan=1&codlan=1&codcol=93&codcch=196 (2) Rampes (2001). The safety of acupuncture. British Medical Journal 2001;323(7311):467 (1 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7311.467, see http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/323/7311/467 (3) From the 'About Us' area of the Clinical Evidence BMJ website, page titled 'How much do we know', http://clinicalevidence.bmj.com/ceweb/about/knowledge.jsp. Extract at Oct 2009: "So what can Clinical Evidence tell us about the state of our current knowledge? What proportion of commonly used treatments are supported by good evidence, what proportion should not be used or used only with caution, and how big are the gaps in our knowledge? Of around 2500 treatments covered 13% are rated as beneficial, 23% likely to be beneficial, 8% as trade off between benefits and harms, 6% unlikely to be beneficial, 4% likely to be ineffective or harmful, and 46%, the largest proportion, as unknown effectiveness" © Jessica Kennedy 2005-09, all rights reserved |